PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Nature Communications· 2025Q1

Systemic impacts of disruptions at maritime chokepoints

Jasper Verschuur, Johannes Lumma, Jim William Hall

Short summary

Disruptions at maritime chokepoints are estimated to cost USD192 billion annually in trade value, with geopolitical risks at the Taiwan Strait and Suez Canal being major drivers.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Annual trade value disrupted at maritime chokepoints is estimated at USD192 billion.
  • Geopolitical risk at the Taiwan Strait and Suez Canal are key drivers of trade disruption.
  • Annual economic losses from delays, rerouting, and increased freight costs total USD14.1 billion.
  • Suez Canal and Bab el-Mandeb Strait risks are major contributors to direct economic losses.
  • Countries in proximity to chokepoints, as well as Western Africa and Central Asia, are most affected.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Global trade relies on a small number of strategic passageways, so-called maritime chokepoints, which are vulnerable to disruptions. Yet, the exposure of countries to these disruptions has not been comprehensively assessed, inhibiting adequate preparedness. Here, we quantify the systemic impacts of maritime chokepoint disruptions subject to a variety of hazards, both natural and human-induced. The expected value of trade disrupted at chokepoints is estimated to be USD192 billion annually, mainly attributed to geopolitical risk at the Taiwan Strait and Suez Canal, and a combination of hazards affecting the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. We estimate the economic losses of chokepoint disruptions, due to delays, rerouting, insurance premiums and trade disruptions, to be USD10.7 billion per year, and an additional USD3.4 billion per year due to increased freight costs. In both cases, risks to the Suez Canal and Bab el-Mandeb Strait drive these losses. Countries most affected are in the vicinity of these two chokepoints, but also further away, including countries in Western Africa and Central Asia. At a time of heightened geopolitical tensions and climate change, our results help to quantify the implications of these risks and can present a useful starting point to identify resilience interventions to mitigate these threats.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Nature Communications, 2025 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Strategy and Management

Strategy and ManagementBusiness, Management and Accounting