PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Resources Conservation and Recycling· 2017Q1

Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions

Julian Kirchherr, Denise Reike, Marko P. Hekkert

Short summary

An analysis of 114 definitions reveals the circular economy is most often understood as simple reduce, reuse, and recycle activities, frequently overlooking its necessity for systemic shifts and explicit links to sustainable development.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Circular economy is commonly defined by reduce, reuse, and recycle activities.
  • Definitions often fail to emphasize the need for systemic shifts.
  • Explicit links to sustainable development are infrequent.
  • Economic prosperity is the primary stated goal, with social equity rarely mentioned.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract The circular economy concept has gained momentum both among scholars and practitioners. However, critics claim that it means many different things to different people. This paper provides further evidence for these critics. The aim of this paper is to create transparency regarding the current understandings of the circular economy concept. For this purpose, we have gathered 114 circular economy definitions which were coded on 17 dimensions. Our findings indicate that the circular economy is most frequently depicted as a combination of reduce, reuse and recycle activities, whereas it is oftentimes not highlighted that CE necessitates a systemic shift. We further find that the definitions show few explicit linkages of the circular economy concept to sustainable development. The main aim of the circular economy is considered to be economic prosperity, followed by environmental quality; its impact on social equity and future generations is barely mentioned. Furthermore, neither business models nor consumers are frequently outlined as enablers of the circular economy. We critically discuss the various circular economy conceptualizations throughout this paper. Overall, we hope to contribute via this study towards the coherence of the circular economy concept; we presume that significantly varying circular economy definitions may eventually result in the collapse of the concept.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2017 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Strategy and Management

Strategy and ManagementBusiness, Management and Accounting