Digital Health· 2019Q1
Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in healthcare: A mixed-methods study
- 803citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2019year
Short summary
A mixed-methods study found 67% of internet users are moderately accepting of AI health chatbots, but hesitancy regarding accuracy, cybersecurity, and AI's lack of empathy may hinder engagement.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 67% of internet users surveyed (N=216) demonstrated moderate acceptability of AI health chatbots.
- Qualitative themes identified concerns about AI accuracy, cybersecurity, and lack of empathy.
- Lower IT skills (OR=0.32) and dislike for computer interaction (OR=0.77) negatively correlated with acceptability.
- Perceived utility (OR=5.10), positive attitude (OR=2.71), and trustworthiness (OR=1.92) positively correlated with acceptability.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in healthcare. Here, AI-based chatbot systems can act as automated conversational agents, capable of promoting health, providing education, and potentially prompting behaviour change. Exploring the motivation to use health chatbots is required to predict uptake; however, few studies to date have explored their acceptability. This research aimed to explore participants’ willingness to engage with AI-led health chatbots. Methods The study incorporated semi-structured interviews (N-29) which informed the development of an online survey (N-216) advertised via social media. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. A survey of 24 items explored demographic and attitudinal variables, including acceptability and perceived utility. The quantitative data were analysed using binary regressions with a single categorical predictor. Results Three broad themes: ‘Understanding of chatbots’, ‘AI hesitancy’ and ‘Motivations for health chatbots’ were identified, outlining concerns about accuracy, cyber-security, and the inability of AI-led services to empathise. The survey showed moderate acceptability (67%), correlated negatively with perceived poorer IT skills OR = 0.32 [CI 95% :0.13–0.78] and dislike for talking to computers OR = 0.77 [CI 95% :0.60–0.99] as well as positively correlated with perceived utility OR = 5.10 [CI 95% :3.08–8.43], positive attitude OR = 2.71 [CI 95% :1.77–4.16] and perceived trustworthiness OR = 1.92 [CI 95% :1.13–3.25]. Conclusion Most internet users would be receptive to using health chatbots, although hesitancy regarding this technology is likely to compromise engagement. Intervention designers focusing on AI-led health chatbots need to employ user-centred and theory-based approaches addressing patients’ concerns and optimising user experience in order to achieve the best uptake and utilisation. Patients’ perspectives, motivation and capabilities need to be taken into account when developing and assessing the effectiveness of health chatbots.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Digital Health, 2019 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Applied Psychology
Applied PsychologyPsychology