Inter-Asia Cultural Studies· 2026Q2
“Asia” in the making: friction, relational authorship, and the pedagogy of productive discomfort in the Asia Documentary Co-Production Network
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Transnational documentary co-productions actively construct the idea of 'Asia' through friction and relational authorship, rather than reflecting a pre-existing regional identity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The concept of 'Asia' is constructed through the process of transnational collaboration, not as a precondition for it.
- Analysis of online meeting transcripts from the Asia Documentary Co-Production Network (ADCN) reveals how students build regional belonging.
- Friction arises both from students referencing each other across national divides and from encountering other nations' histories, which estranges them from their own.
- The study emphasizes the asymmetries in resources, language, and power within online collaborations, challenging frictionless models.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This article argues that “Asia,” as a category of regional belonging, is not a precondition of transnational collaboration but a relation produced within it—assembled, incrementally and unevenly, in the friction of cross-border documentary co-production. Drawing on the Asia Documentary Co-Production Network (ADCN), a hybrid pedagogical project linking film schools across East and Southeast Asia, it reads the transcripts of monthly online meetings, rather than the finished films, as its primary text. Through a critical autoethnography written from the position of a faculty mentor and former chair, it traces friction in two directions: outward, where students raised in mutual national hostility come to reference one another laterally and so constitute the region in real time; and inward, where an encounter with another nation’s history estranges students from their own. Building a single conceptual chain from Tsing’s friction through platform mediation and radical listening to Chen’s inter-Asian referencing and critical syncretism, the article shows these concepts being enacted at the smallest scale—by undergraduates, over poor connections—and, crucially, where they fail. Against celebratory accounts of frictionless online collaboration, it insists on asymmetry: of resource, of language, and of the mentor’s power to redirect. “Asia” so understood is closer to a verb than a noun—permanently unfinished, and real in the measure of that unfinishedness.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Religious studies
Religious studiesArts and Humanities