PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Scientific Reports· 2026Q1

Short-duration, managed grazing system increases net ecosystem carbon uptake and water use efficiency on a working ranch

R. Phillips, Xinhua Zhou, Haku Bo

Short summary

A short-duration, high-intensity rotational grazing system nearly doubled net ecosystem carbon uptake (NEP) and increased net carbon sequestration by 53% and 23% in the first and second years, respectively, compared to ungrazed controls on a U.S. northern prairie ranch.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Managed rotational grazing nearly doubled annual net ecosystem production (NEP) compared to ungrazed controls.
  • Net carbon sequestration under managed grazing was 1.01 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ (first year) and 0.37 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ (second year), exceeding controls by 53% and 23%.
  • Grazing initially decreased leaf area index and daily C uptake, but the ecosystem recovered with elevated C uptake and resource-use efficiencies by autumn.
  • The study quantified water and C fluxes over two years using eddy covariance and field measurements on a working cattle ranch.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Grasslands are globally significant carbon (C) sinks, but data quantifying how multi-paddock, managed grazing sytems alter ecosystem fluxes and the annual C budget are limited. We hypothesized a high-intensity (150 cow-calf pair), short-duration (2 days), rotational grazing system targeting 50% utilization, followed by extended rest and recovery, could improve net C uptake (net ecosystem production; NEP), water use efficiency (WUE), and the net amount of C sequestered (C budget) by the ecosystem annually. We quantified water and C fluxes over two full years using eddy covariance and field-based measurements of C removed by grazers on a U.S. northern prairie working cattle ranch. Managed grazing nearly doubled annual NEP for both yearly cycles, as compared to ungrazed control. The net amount of C sequestered under managed grazing reached 1.01 and 0.37 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ in the first and second cycle, respectively—53% and 23% greater than ungrazed control. Grazing initially decreased leaf area index and daily C uptake, but the ecosystem gradually recovered through autumn, with elevated C uptake and resource-use efficiencies. Our findings demonstrate that improvements in grassland C uptake, C sequestration, and allocation of water to production can be achieved through inclusion of grazers and adaptive grassland management.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

ForestryAgricultural and Biological Sciences