PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Ecosystem Services· 2026Q1

Potential of temperate agroforestry systems to deliver ecosystem services: An evidence map

Andrea Schievano, Camille Rubeaud, Margret Köthke, Beatrice Landoni et al.

Short summary

An umbrella review of 42 meta-analyses reveals temperate agroforestry systems significantly boost soil carbon sequestration (over 65% of assessments) and soil quality indicators (154 results), but evidence for provisioning services is mixed and cultural services are unaddressed.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Temperate agroforestry systems show significant positive effects on soil carbon sequestration (over 65% of assessments).
  • Multiple soil quality indicators are positively impacted, with 154 reported results.
  • Evidence for provisioning ecosystem services is variable and often uses metrics that don't capture integrated production.
  • Cultural ecosystem services have no meta-analytical evidence, indicating a significant knowledge gap.
  • Methodological quality of the underlying studies was variable, with reporting shortcomings.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract. Agroforestry systems are promoted as multifunctional land-use strategies, yet evidence of their benefits, especially in temperate regions, remains fragmented. This umbrella review maps 42 meta-analyses to quantify the effects of agroforestry on environmental, climate, and productivity outcomes, with a focus on temperate pedo-climates. Our evidence map reveals a strong consensus on key regulating ecosystem services: a clear majority of assessments (over 65 %) reported significantly positive effects on soil carbon sequestration and multiple indicators of soil quality (154 results). In contrast, effects on provisioning services are more variable. However, the most reported metrics (e.g. single-crop yield) hardly represent the integrated provision of different food or non-food products on the same land, while more comprehensive indicators are rarely used (e.g. land equivalent ratio). Mapping outcomes to the CICES framework highlights several relevant knowledge gaps and a total absence of meta-analytical evidence for Cultural Ecosystem Services. Methodological quality was variable, with frequent shortcomings in reporting study selection and statistical analysis. We provide a list of 1500 primary literature references and a global map of geolocations highlighting the experiments available for temperate pedo-climates. This synthesis provides a robust evidence base for policymakers, pinpointing both established benefits and critical research gaps needed to fully leverage agroforestry in temperate regions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Ecosystem Services, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

ForestryAgricultural and Biological Sciences