PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Education Sciences· 2026Q1

Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Primary Education: A Case Study in a Directed Independent Learning School

Liina Kersna, Kristjan-Julius Laak, Liina Lepp, Margus Pedaste

Short summary

Primary school teachers enacted similar self-regulated learning (SRL) support principles differently across Grades 1-3 and 4-6, adapting practices like daily vs. weekly learning guides and feedback frequency to age-specific needs.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • SRL-supportive practices in primary school included supportive structures, autonomy, scaffolding, co-regulation, and collaboration.
  • Younger students (Grades 1-3) used teacher-prepared daily learning guides with structured choices and frequent feedback.
  • Older students (Grades 4-6) used weekly digital learning guides allowing for co-construction, peer regulation, and individualized planning.
  • Similar SRL principles were implemented differently based on classroom organization, learning guides, and student participation opportunities.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Supporting students’ self-regulated learning (SRL) in school is essential for fostering self-directed learners and depends largely on how teachers design learning environments and instructional tasks. The aim of this case study is to examine how SRL-supportive classroom practices manifest across two learning groups in a primary school implementing directed independent learning. Participants included 59 students from two multi-age learning groups and four teachers. Learning activities were observed over one school week in both groups, and teacher interviews were conducted before and after the observations. Data were analysed using qualitative deductive content analysis. Findings indicated that in both learning groups, SRL-supportive practices included supportive classroom structures, opportunities for student autonomy, scaffolding and co-regulation, and practices supporting a collaborative learning community. In Grades 1–3, teacher-prepared daily learning guides structured choices and provided opportunities for frequent feedback, whereas in Grades 4–6, weekly digital learning guides provided opportunities for co-construction of plans, peer-supported regulation and more individualised planning. The findings highlight how similar SRL-supportive principles were enacted differently across the two learning groups, reflecting differences in classroom organisation, learning guides, and opportunities for student participation and autonomy.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Education Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Developmental and Educational Psychology

Developmental and Educational PsychologyPsychology