PofoliaShared via Pofolia

African Identities· 2026Q1

Persuasive strategies and ideological framing in Cyril Ramaphosa’s 2026 State of the Nation Address: a critical discourse analysis

Respect Mlambo

Short summary

Cyril Ramaphosa's 2026 State of the Nation Address utilized positive self-presentation, inclusive pronouns, and national in-group construction to build a narrative of unified national identity and governance legitimacy.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Ramaphosa used positive self-presentation and inclusive pronouns to foster a sense of national unity.
  • The address constructed a national in-group, contrasting it with threats like crime to enhance credibility.
  • Historical appeals and future promises reinforced moral legitimacy and policy competence.
  • Linguistic and rhetorical devices were employed to build public trust and national cohesion.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This study examines persuasive strategies and ideological framing in the 2026 State of the Nation Address (SONA) delivered by President Cyril Ramaphosa. The study adopted a descriptive qualitative research design and was grounded in Teun A. van Dijk’s socio-cognitive and ideological discourse framework. Purposive sampling was utilised to identify and select salient Excerpts from the 2026 SONA that exemplify significant rhetorical and ideological features. These Excerpts were analysed through the lens of Critical Discourse Analysis to explore how linguistic choices operate as persuasive strategies and as vehicles of ideological construction. The findings reveal that Cyril Ramaphosa employed multiple persuasive strategies to construct a coherent narrative of national identity, governance legitimacy, and collective responsibility. The strategies included positive self-presentation, inclusive pronouns, and national in-group construction, framing government and citizens as a unified, resilient collective. Controlled negative presentation acknowledged challenges while sustaining credibility, and ideological polarisation contrasted the in-group with threats such as crime. Historical appeals, repetition, parallelism, and future-oriented promises reinforced moral legitimacy, civic values, and policy competence. These strategies intertwined linguistic, rhetorical, and ideological devices to construct representations of public trust, collective participation, and national cohesion, while simultaneously negotiating the challenges of political legitimacy, coalition governance, and socioeconomic inequality.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. African Identities, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Linguistics and Language

Linguistics and LanguageSocial Sciences