Ethnicities· 2026Q1
Rethinking Diaspora Agency in Peace and Conflict
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
This paper argues for a nuanced understanding of diaspora actors in peace and conflict, moving beyond the reductive 'peacemaker'/'peace wrecker' dichotomy.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Diaspora roles in conflict and peacebuilding have been historically framed as either 'peacemakers' or 'peace wreckers'.
- This binary lens, while a useful heuristic, has limited a deeper understanding of diaspora agency.
- The paper calls for a move towards a nuanced understanding of diaspora engagement, acknowledging its complexity and context-specificity.
- The special issue examines diaspora politics, agency, vulnerability, mobilization, and internal divisions during conflict.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Diasporas’ versatile roles as victims of conflict, participants in conflict and agents of peacebuilding have been widely explored. We observe that diaspora contributions to ongoing conflicts and subsequent peacebuilding mechanisms have long been framed through a binary lens. Until recently, in both academic and policy debates, diasporas were frequently cast either as “peacemakers,” contributing to reconciliation, reconstruction, and dialogue, or as “peace wreckers,” fuelling violence, sustaining grievances, and prolonging conflicts from afar. Although recent studies have mostly moved away from this approach, this dichotomy has provided a convenient heuristic for categorising diaspora engagement in homeland conflicts and has shaped much of the empirical and normative literature in this field. Despite this growing empirical visibility, dominant analytical frameworks in international relations and peace and conflict studies have struggled to adequately conceptualise diaspora agency. In this special issue, we seek to advance current debates on diasporas in peace and conflict by moving beyond this reductive peacemaker/peace wrecker dichotomy. While existing literature has made important strides in recognising the transnational roles diasporas play, we argue for a more nuanced understanding of the ambivalent, shifting, and context-specific ways in which diaspora actors relate to conflict and peacebuilding processes. The articles included in this special issue provide a multidimensional analysis of diaspora politics, examining diasporas’ complex political agency and vulnerability, what determines and constrains their mobilization, and how they deal with internal divisions during times of conflict.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Ethnicities, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Demography
DemographySocial Sciences