PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Ethnicities· 2026Q1

Diasporas and conflict transformation: Towards a new analytical framework

Bahar Başer, Élise Féron

Short summary

This article proposes a new analytical framework by integrating diaspora studies with conflict transformation (CT) theory, arguing this synergy better explains diasporas' diverse and evolving roles in peace and conflict.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Diasporas are increasingly recognized as influential actors in contemporary conflicts, engaging in peacebuilding and conflict resolution.
  • Existing research has analyzed diaspora roles and mobilization but has paid limited attention to their intersection with conflict transformation (CT) theory.
  • This article introduces a new analytical framework by systematically integrating diaspora studies with CT theory.
  • The proposed framework enhances understanding of diasporas' diverse and evolving roles in peace and conflict settings.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Diasporas are increasingly perceived as influential actors in contemporary conflicts as they directly or indirectly engage in peacebuilding and conflict resolution in their countries of origin and residence. Existing scholarship has well analysed what roles diasporas can play, how they mobilize towards certain goals and engage with multiple stakeholders in peacebuilding and post-conflict reconstruction activities. Scholars have borrowed concepts and theoretical frameworks from various disciplines to further understand the scope and capacity of diaspora influence in such processes. Yet, limited attention has been paid to how diaspora studies intersect with peace and conflict studies (PCS), particularly theories surrounding conflict transformation (CT). Recent scholarship has convincingly demonstrated that diaspora engagement is fluid, heterogeneous, and evolving. However, these advances have largely developed within diaspora studies without sustained engagement with theoretical debates in peace and conflict studies. This article addresses that gap by bringing diaspora studies into systematic dialogue with CT theory. It argues that a CT perspective provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the diverse and evolving roles of diasporas in peace and conflict settings while also demonstrating how diaspora studies can enrich CT by foregrounding transnational actors, dispersed spaces, and plural temporalities.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Ethnicities, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Demography

DemographySocial Sciences