Molecules· 2026Q1
Comparative Remineralization Efficacy of Different Physical Forms of Chitosan in a Newly Developed Olive Leaf Extract-Containing Artificial Saliva
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Chitosan solution and film formulations significantly enhanced post-bleaching enamel microhardness recovery compared to gel and control groups in an olive leaf extract-containing artificial saliva system.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Chitosan, in film, gel, and solution forms, enhanced enamel microhardness recovery after bleaching.
- Chitosan solution showed the greatest numerical microhardness gain (ΔVHN), significantly higher than the gel.
- All chitosan groups demonstrated greater microhardness gains than the control group.
- Elemental analysis revealed significant differences in calcium gain and calcium/phosphorus ratio changes among groups.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Plant-derived bioactive compounds and natural biopolymers are increasingly investigated as components of multifunctional remineralization systems. This in vitro study compared the remineralization efficacy of chitosan film, gel, and solution on bleached human enamel within an olive leaf extract-containing artificial saliva system. The novelty of the present study lies in the direct comparison of three physical presentations of chitosan—film, gel, and solution—within a common olive leaf extract-containing artificial saliva platform. Olive leaf extract was incorporated as a common component of the artificial saliva in all groups and was not evaluated as an independent experimental factor. Seventy-six sound human anterior teeth were used; 60 were randomly allocated to four groups (n = 15) for Vickers microhardness analysis, and 16 (n = 4/group) were evaluated by SEM–EDX. Following bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide, specimens underwent 28-day remineralization protocols. Microhardness was measured at baseline, after bleaching, and after remineralization. Bleaching significantly reduced microhardness, whereas remineralization significantly increased it in all groups (p < 0.001). Microhardness gain (ΔVHN) differed among groups (p < 0.001), with all chitosan formulations showing greater gains than the control (p < 0.05). The solution showed the greatest numerical ΔVHN and a significantly greater gain than the gel (p = 0.015), but not the film. EDX revealed significant between-group differences in Ca gain (p = 0.017) and Ca/P ratio change (p = 0.033). Chitosan enhanced post-bleaching enamel microhardness recovery, with solution and film formulations showing particularly favorable remineralization responses.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Molecules, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Orthodontics
OrthodonticsDentistry