BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth· 2026Q1
Omega-3 supplementation during pregnancy in relation to reported information sources: an exploratory cross-sectional study
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Pregnant women who reported midwives as an information source were 6.8x more likely to currently supplement with omega-3s, while those using digital/media sources were 6.6x more likely to have used them preconception.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Midwife information sources were associated with a 6.8x higher odds of current omega-3 supplementation.
- Digital/media information sources were associated with a 6.5x higher odds of preconception omega-3 use.
- No clear association was found between educational attainment and omega-3 supplementation in this highly educated sample.
- The study included 127 pregnant women and used exploratory cross-sectional analysis.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Background Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation during pregnancy is recommended in certain settings and may be relevant for maternal and fetal health, yet uptake varies widely. While educational attainment is commonly considered a determinant of health behavior, the relationship between reported information sources and supplementation practices during pregnancy remains insufficiently understood. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among pregnant women attending a university hospital in Germany between June 2024 and January 2025. Data were collected on current omega-3 supplementation, preconception omega-3 use, educational attainment, parity, and reported sources of information about dietary supplements. Source-specific associations with current and preconception omega-3 use were examined exploratorily using 2 × 2 contingency tables. Conditional maximum-likelihood odds ratios (ORs) with central exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and corresponding two-sided central exact P values were calculated. Results A total of 127 completed questionnaires were included. Overall, 75.6% of participants reported current omega-3 supplementation, while 34.6% reported preconception omega-3 use. The internet was the most frequently reported source of information about dietary supplements (73.2%), followed by gynecologists (56.7%) and books (37.0%). Participants reporting midwives as an information source had higher estimated odds of current omega-3 supplementation (OR 6.84, 95% CI 1.56–62.84). Participants reporting digital/media sources had higher estimated odds of preconception omega-3 use (OR 6.59, 95% CI 1.47–61.13). Both estimates were imprecise, with wide confidence intervals. No clear association between educational attainment and omega-3 supplementation was observed in this highly educated sample. Conclusions In this selective sample, exploratory analyses identified patterns of co-occurrence between reported sources of information about dietary supplements and omega-3 supplementation behavior. The findings do not establish that specific information sources provided omega-3-specific advice, influenced supplementation behavior, or preceded omega-3 use. Larger prospective studies are needed to examine these relationships and the content and timing of information exposure.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Nutrition and Dietetics
Nutrition and DieteticsNursing