PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth· 2026Q1

Omega-3 supplementation during pregnancy in relation to reported information sources: an exploratory cross-sectional study

Anna Elisabeth Hentrich, Doerthe Brueggmann, Samira Catharina Hoock, Lukas Jennewein et al.

Short summary

Pregnant women who reported midwives as an information source were 6.8x more likely to currently supplement with omega-3s, while those using digital/media sources were 6.6x more likely to have used them preconception.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Midwife information sources were associated with a 6.8x higher odds of current omega-3 supplementation.
  • Digital/media information sources were associated with a 6.5x higher odds of preconception omega-3 use.
  • No clear association was found between educational attainment and omega-3 supplementation in this highly educated sample.
  • The study included 127 pregnant women and used exploratory cross-sectional analysis.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation during pregnancy is recommended in certain settings and may be relevant for maternal and fetal health, yet uptake varies widely. While educational attainment is commonly considered a determinant of health behavior, the relationship between reported information sources and supplementation practices during pregnancy remains insufficiently understood. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among pregnant women attending a university hospital in Germany between June 2024 and January 2025. Data were collected on current omega-3 supplementation, preconception omega-3 use, educational attainment, parity, and reported sources of information about dietary supplements. Source-specific associations with current and preconception omega-3 use were examined exploratorily using 2 × 2 contingency tables. Conditional maximum-likelihood odds ratios (ORs) with central exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and corresponding two-sided central exact P values were calculated. Results A total of 127 completed questionnaires were included. Overall, 75.6% of participants reported current omega-3 supplementation, while 34.6% reported preconception omega-3 use. The internet was the most frequently reported source of information about dietary supplements (73.2%), followed by gynecologists (56.7%) and books (37.0%). Participants reporting midwives as an information source had higher estimated odds of current omega-3 supplementation (OR 6.84, 95% CI 1.56–62.84). Participants reporting digital/media sources had higher estimated odds of preconception omega-3 use (OR 6.59, 95% CI 1.47–61.13). Both estimates were imprecise, with wide confidence intervals. No clear association between educational attainment and omega-3 supplementation was observed in this highly educated sample. Conclusions In this selective sample, exploratory analyses identified patterns of co-occurrence between reported sources of information about dietary supplements and omega-3 supplementation behavior. The findings do not establish that specific information sources provided omega-3-specific advice, influenced supplementation behavior, or preceded omega-3 use. Larger prospective studies are needed to examine these relationships and the content and timing of information exposure.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Nutrition and Dietetics

Nutrition and DieteticsNursing