PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Public Health· 2013Q1· Review

Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Linda Bolier, Merel Haverman, Gerben J. Westerhof, Heleen Riper et al.

Short summary

Positive psychology interventions show small but significant effects (SMD 0.34 for subjective well-being, 0.20 for psychological well-being, 0.23 for depression) in a meta-analysis of 39 studies (n=6,139).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Positive psychology interventions have small positive effects on subjective well-being (SMD 0.34), psychological well-being (SMD 0.20), and depression (SMD 0.23).
  • Effects on well-being are sustainable, remaining significant at 3-6 month follow-up.
  • Intervention effectiveness for depression is moderated by duration, recruitment method, target population (psychosocial problems), delivery format (individual), and study quality.
  • High heterogeneity and potential publication bias were noted across the 39 included studies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of positive psychological interventions may be considered as a complementary strategy in mental health promotion and treatment. The present article constitutes a meta-analytical study of the effectiveness of positive psychology interventions for the general public and for individuals with specific psychosocial problems. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, PsychInfo, the Cochrane register, and manual searches. Forty articles, describing 39 studies, totaling 6,139 participants, met the criteria for inclusion. The outcome measures used were subjective well-being, psychological well-being and depression. Positive psychology interventions included self-help interventions, group training and individual therapy. RESULTS: The standardized mean difference was 0.34 for subjective well-being, 0.20 for psychological well-being and 0.23 for depression indicating small effects for positive psychology interventions. At follow-up from three to six months, effect sizes are small, but still significant for subjective well-being and psychological well-being, indicating that effects are fairly sustainable. Heterogeneity was rather high, due to the wide diversity of the studies included. Several variables moderated the impact on depression: Interventions were more effective if they were of longer duration, if recruitment was conducted via referral or hospital, if interventions were delivered to people with certain psychosocial problems and on an individual basis, and if the study design was of low quality. Moreover, indications for publication bias were found, and the quality of the studies varied considerably. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis show that positive psychology interventions can be effective in the enhancement of subjective well-being and psychological well-being, as well as in helping to reduce depressive symptoms. Additional high-quality peer-reviewed studies in diverse (clinical) populations are needed to strengthen the evidence-base for positive psychology interventions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Public Health, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Social Psychology

Social PsychologyPsychology