PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMJ· 2019Q1· Review

Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis

Brooke Levis, Andrea Benedetti, Brett D. Thombs

Short summary

A meta-analysis of individual participant data (n=17,357) found the PHQ-9 screening tool has a sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.85 for detecting major depression when using a cut-off score of 10 or above with semistructured diagnostic interviews.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The PHQ-9 achieved a sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.85 for detecting major depression at a cut-off score of 10+ when using semistructured diagnostic interviews (n=6,725).
  • Sensitivity was 5-22% higher with semistructured interviews compared to fully structured interviews (excluding MINI).
  • Specificity was similar across different types of diagnostic interviews.
  • A cut-off score of 10 or above is recommended regardless of patient age.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression. DESIGN: Individual participant data meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, and Web of Science (January 2000-February 2015). INCLUSION CRITERIA: Eligible studies compared PHQ-9 scores with major depression diagnoses from validated diagnostic interviews. Primary study data and study level data extracted from primary reports were synthesized. For PHQ-9 cut-off scores 5-15, bivariate random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity, separately, among studies that used semistructured diagnostic interviews, which are designed for administration by clinicians; fully structured interviews, which are designed for lay administration; and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric (MINI) diagnostic interviews, a brief fully structured interview. Sensitivity and specificity were examined among participant subgroups and, separately, using meta-regression, considering all subgroup variables in a single model. RESULTS: Data were obtained for 58 of 72 eligible studies (total n=17 357; major depression cases n=2312). Combined sensitivity and specificity was maximized at a cut-off score of 10 or above among studies using a semistructured interview (29 studies, 6725 participants; sensitivity 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.92; specificity 0.85, 0.82 to 0.88). Across cut-off scores 5-15, sensitivity with semistructured interviews was 5-22% higher than for fully structured interviews (MINI excluded; 14 studies, 7680 participants) and 2-15% higher than for the MINI (15 studies, 2952 participants). Specificity was similar across diagnostic interviews. The PHQ-9 seems to be similarly sensitive but may be less specific for younger patients than for older patients; a cut-off score of 10 or above can be used regardless of age.. CONCLUSIONS: PHQ-9 sensitivity compared with semistructured diagnostic interviews was greater than in previous conventional meta-analyses that combined reference standards. A cut-off score of 10 or above maximized combined sensitivity and specificity overall and for subgroups. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014010673.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMJ, 2019 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Social Psychology

Social PsychologyPsychology