Journal of Humanistic Psychology· 2026Q1
Introducing a New Dimension of Individual Differences in Existential Psychology: Development and Initial Validation of the Existential Reflection Scale
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new 11-item Existential Reflection Scale (ERS) has been developed and validated, measuring individuals' curiosity and enjoyment in reflecting on their own existence, a dimension previously unaddressed in existential psychology.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Developed and validated the 11-item Existential Reflection Scale (ERS).
- ERS measures curiosity and enjoyment in reflecting on one's own existence.
- Scale shows high internal reliability (ω=.808) and concurrent validity with meaning/purpose scales.
- Validated across seven British samples (n=836).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Measuring individual differences in existential psychology has traditionally been centred around two key themes: (a) the ways in which individuals seek or attain meaning and purpose in life and (b) the extent of their anxiety related to existence and mortality. We introduce a new dimension of individual differences within existentialism: the extent to which individuals are curious about and enjoy reflecting on their own existence. This is a dimension of individual differences that has not been addressed effectively so far, and we discuss the importance of this trait within different social contexts. The new 11-item Existential Reflection Scale underwent a preliminary validation in seven British samples ( n = 836). The scale showed high internal reliability ( ω = .808) and concurrent validity with existing scales, including measures of meaning and purpose in life. We discuss the ways in which the scale can be of value for predicting cognitive and behavioural tendencies, such as in situations where the concept of mortality is made salient, or when individuals process information of an existential nature.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Social Psychology
Social PsychologyPsychology