PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Applied Physics Letters· 2026Q1

Thermal conductivity and temperature-induced bandgap renormalization in crystalline and amorphous Ga2O3

Rustam I. Arabov, Jiaxuan Li, Xiaotong Chen, Nikita Rybin et al.

Short summary

Amorphous Ga2O3 has a thermal conductivity ~10x lower than crystalline β-Ga2O3, and its bandgap shifts less with temperature (0.18 eV difference at 900 K).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Amorphous Ga2O3 thermal conductivity is ~0.9 W m−1 K−1 between 300-700 K, ~10x lower than crystalline β-Ga2O3.
  • Crystalline β-Ga2O3 exhibits ~0.45 eV bandgap renormalization (BGR) at 700 K.
  • Temperature-induced BGR is stronger in crystalline β-Ga2O3 than amorphous Ga2O3, differing by ~0.18 eV at 900 K.
  • A machine-learned potential coupled with first-principles calculations predicts semiconductor properties under operating conditions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The lattice thermal conductivity (LTC) and electron–phonon interactions in crystalline and amorphous gallium oxide are herein determined by coupling a machine-learned interatomic potential, namely the moment tensor potential model, to first-principles calculations. Crystalline β-Ga2O3 exhibits a substantial bandgap renormalization (BGR) of ∼0.45 eV at 700 K, with ∼0.2 eV caused by zero-point BGR. The computed temperature dependence of BGR induced by classical nuclear motion in β-Ga2O3 is stronger than that in amorphous Ga2O3, with the difference in BGR reaching ∼0.18 eV at 900 K. Thermal transport calculations reveal that the LTC of amorphous Ga2O3 remains near 0.9 W m−1 K−1 for temperatures between 300 and 700 K, which is approximately an order of magnitude lower than that of crystalline β-Ga2O3. Overall, the presented framework provides a computationally tractable and reliable route for predicting properties of semiconductors (both crystalline and amorphous) under operating conditions relevant to microelectronics and optoelectronics.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Applied Physics Letters, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

Electronic, Optical and Magnetic MaterialsMaterials Science