PofoliaShared via Pofolia

American Antiquity· 2016Q1

Theoretical Challenges of Indigenous Archaeology: Setting an Agenda

Ian J. McNiven

Short summary

Indigenous archaeology's theoretical contributions to interpreting archaeological materials are minimally articulated beyond practice, lacking a clear interpretative agenda.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Indigenous archaeology's theoretical contributions to interpreting archaeological materials are underdeveloped.
  • A core concern is challenging Western archaeology's ontological and epistemological divides.
  • The paper proposes two dimensions for an interpretative agenda: ancestral presence and the ethnographically known recent past.
  • Embracing these challenges offers opportunities for mainstream archaeology to become more cross-culturally relevant.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Indigenous archaeology focuses on laudable processes of collaborative community research and decolonization. In contrast, theoretical contributions of Indigenous archaeology in terms of interpreting archaeological materials have been minimally articulated beyond praxis. Does Indigenous archaeology have an interpretative theoretical agenda? This paper addresses this question and articulates an agenda through distillation of theoretical developments and concerns from the considerable literature on Indigenous archaeology that has emerged from the Americas, Australia, and Africa over the past two decades. A shared fundamental concern is challenging ontological and epistemological divides and dualisms within mainstream Western archaeology. Two key dimensions of Indigenous archaeology are elaborated to provide broader scope to contextualize and address these theoretical challenges. First, encountering the past challenges objectivist tangibility of the archaeological record with ancestral presence and contexts where artifactual absence is the (in)tangible signature of spiritual association. Second, historicing the present challenges secularist archaeologies of a detached past with archaeologies of the more familiar ethnographically known recent past linked to identity and diachronic explorations of ontology and spiritualism. An agenda that embraces these theoretical challenges presents major opportunities for mainstream archaeology to reorient its Eurocentric focus and produce more cross-culturally relevant and culturally nuanced and sensitive understandings of the past.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. American Antiquity, 2016 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Archeology (Social Sciences)

ArcheologySocial Sciences