PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Molecular Sciences· 2026Q1

How the Acute Psychosocial Stress Response Ends: A Post-Stressor Transition Model of Glucocorticoid Feedback, Vagal Re-Engagement, and Frontolimbic Context Updating

Congcong Liu, Ronglian Zheng, Yihan Wu, Meng Zhang

Short summary

A new Post-Stressor Transition Model (PSTM) proposes that recovery from acute psychosocial stress is not a single event but a multi-stage process involving the updating of threat perception, shifts in autonomic nervous system control, and regulation of the stress hormone cortisol.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Recovery from acute psychosocial stress is a multi-stage process, not an immediate return to baseline.
  • The Post-Stressor Transition Model (PSTM) identifies three key regulatory functions: threat updating, autonomic rebalancing, and HPA axis regulation.
  • Molecular factors like glucocorticoid receptor signaling, catecholamines, and endocannabinoids are crucial for these recovery functions.
  • The model distinguishes between objective stressor offset and the actual physiological resolution of stress responses.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Objective stressor offset does not mark a common onset of recovery: cardiovascular activation may be waning while cortisol is still rising and threat-related cognition persists. This structured narrative review integrates molecular, autonomic, neural, cognitive, and immune evidence on the post-stressor interval, primarily in adult psychosocial-stress paradigms. We propose the Post-Stressor Transition Model (PSTM) as an operational extension of existing recovery and allostatic accounts, not as a newly discovered biological system. Three regulatory functions organize the synthesis: updating whether threat remains current, changing cardiac autonomic influence, and regulating continuing hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical output. Glucocorticoid receptor signaling, catecholamines, endocannabinoids, oxytocin, and vasopressin contribute across these functions. The framework distinguishes objective offset from system-specific extrema, physiological resolution from demonstrated adaptation, and shared timing from directional coupling. Eight propositions specify outcomes, temporal windows, competing explanations, and prespecified effect bounds. Measurement recommendations address cortisol nonresponse, respiratory influences on heart rate variability, assessment reactivity, and multirate sampling. Hormonal state and development modify candidate parameters rather than define fixed response types. No universal recovery threshold or clinically validated transition profile is claimed. The model is useful only if its additional parameters are identifiable, improve independent prediction, and withstand phase-specific experimental tests.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Behavioral Neuroscience

Behavioral NeuroscienceNeuroscience