African Archaeological Review· 2016Q1
Earliest Evidence for the Ivory Trade in Southern Africa: Isotopic and ZooMS Analysis of Seventh–Tenth Century ad Ivory from KwaZulu-Natal
- 76citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2016year
Short summary
Ivory artifacts from three South African sites (KwaGandaganda, Ndondondwane, Wosi) dating to the 7th-10th centuries AD show evidence of elephant ivory procurement from both local river valleys and distant savannah environments, predating known ivory trade routes by 200 years.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Ivory artifacts from KwaGandaganda, Ndondondwane, and Wosi (7th-10th centuries AD) represent the earliest evidence of ivory trade in Southern Africa.
- All studied ivory was identified as elephant using ZooMS, despite the presence of hippopotamus remains at the sites.
- Isotopic analysis indicates ivory was sourced from both local river valleys and distant savannah environments.
- The findings suggest regional resource partitioning and significant effort invested in ivory procurement, with potential links to Indian Ocean trade.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
KwaGandaganda, Ndondondwane and Wosi were major Early Farming Community settlements in what is today the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa. These sites have yielded, among other remains, abundant evidence of ivory and ivory working dating to the seventh–tenth centuries ad , pre-dating by approximately 200 years the better-known ivory artefacts from sites in the Limpopo River Valley and surrounding regions. We report the results of carbon, nitrogen and strontium isotope analysis to explore the origins and procurement of this ivory, in combination with Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry (ZooMS) to identify the species of animals from which it was derived. All of the ivory studied using ZooMS was elephant, despite the presence of hippopotamus remains on all three sites. Some ivory was probably obtained from elephant herds that lived close to the sites, in the densely wooded river valleys favoured by both elephants and early farmers. Other material came from savannah environments further afield. Ivory found at these three sites was drawn from different catchments, implying a degree of landscape/resource partitioning even at this early stage. These communities clearly invested substantial effort in obtaining ivory from across the region, which speaks to the importance of this commodity in the economy of the time. We suggest that some ivory items were for local use, but that some may have been intended for more distant markets via Indian Ocean trade.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. African Archaeological Review, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Archeology (Social Sciences)
ArcheologySocial Sciences