Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being· 2026Q1
Perceptions of AI‐generated informational texts and effects of the source: An online experiment
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Informing readers that a text was AI-generated did not influence their ratings of trustworthiness, interest, or understanding among 774 participants, with only 41.5% noticing the AI source.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Source information (AI vs. not specified) did not affect participant ratings of trustworthiness, interest, perceived understanding, or intention to act/share.
- Only 41.5% of participants in the AI source condition noticed that the text was produced by AI.
- Noticing the AI source was associated with higher education levels and greater nutrition knowledge.
- AI-generated nutrition information is generally perceived as trustworthy, irrespective of source awareness.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly common for health information seeking, yet many people are still skeptical of its performance. This between-subjects online experiment tested whether informing readers that a text was produced by AI influenced their ratings in 774 participants. They were randomly assigned to read one of six brief texts and rated trustworthiness, interest, and perceived understanding, as well as intention to act upon the received information and willingness to share the information with others. Source information did not influence ratings, but only 41.5% of participants in the AI source condition noticed the source. Source awareness was associated with higher education and greater nutrition knowledge. Nutrition information produced by AI chatbots is generally seen as trustworthy, although source information is often ignored. Our research highlights critical implications for public health messaging in the digital age as consumers may not differentiate between information generated by AI versus other sources, although future research is required to assess source perceptions in AI-generated texts in more detail.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: General Health Professions
General Health ProfessionsHealth Professions