PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Global Challenges· 2017Q1

Governing the Interlinkages between the Sustainable Development Goals: Approaches to Attain Policy Integration

Jale Tosun, Julia Leininger

Short summary

National governments interpret and implement the Sustainable Development Goals' (SDGs) policy coherence target differently, with domestic policy-making processes, not SDG interlinkages or national characteristics, driving these divergent strategies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • National governments show divergent interpretations and implementation strategies for the SDG policy coherence target.
  • Differences in implementation are driven by domestic policy-making processes, not by the inherent interlinkages of SDGs or national characteristics like income or centralization.
  • Examples include Turkey's path-dependent approach versus Colombia's strategy of defining new policy measures and institutions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of 2015 form a universal and integrated policy agenda to be realized over the next 15 years. One of the targets is the attainment of policy coherence for sustainable development, which requires the individual goals to become interlinked. This article's main research interest lies in assessing how national governments and their competent ministries interpret and strive to implement the target of policy coherence for sustainable development. Drawing on the Voluntary National Reviews submitted in 2016 and 2017 by six countries, this study shows that at the national level, the links among the different goals and the idea of policy integration are subject to divergent interpretations. The differences observed do not stem from the interlinkages of the SDGs as defined by the United Nations, neither do they result from different levels of income or degree of political centralization. Instead, the respective domestic policy-making processes are likely to explain the implementation strategies adopted by the individual states. For example, the implementation approach adopted by the government of Turkey suggests that path-dependency is critical, whereas the Colombian approach consists of defining new policy measures and institutional arrangements.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Global Challenges, 2017 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Development

DevelopmentSocial Sciences