PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Disability and Rehabilitation· 2026Q1· Review

Continuity of care interventions for people with stroke and their caregivers: a scoping review of randomized controlled trials

Meera Premnazeer, Sarah Munce, Mark Theodore Bayley, Ellen Seto et al.

Short summary

A scoping review of 65 continuity of care interventions for stroke survivors found that most interventions focus solely on the survivor and primarily address the transition from hospital to home, neglecting caregivers and other transition points.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 65 continuity of care interventions for stroke survivors were identified from 80 randomized controlled trials.
  • Most interventions focused solely on stroke survivors, not including caregivers.
  • Interventions predominantly addressed the transition from acute inpatient care to home.
  • On average, interventions covered two of three continuity of care dimensions and two of four family-centered care components.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

PURPOSE: People with stroke (PwS) and their family caregivers characterize transitions across care environments as challenging. Enhancing the family-centered nature of continuity of care interventions could improve experiences and outcomes. This scoping review aimed to synthesize the literature on continuity of care interventions for PwS and/or their caregivers. METHODS: The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews was followed. Five databases were searched, and only randomized controlled trials were included. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and deductive content analysis. RESULTS: We included 65 interventions identified from 80 included studies. Most intervention studies included only PwS. Most interventions addressed the transition from acute inpatient management to home care services. On average, two of three continuity of care dimensions were addressed, and two of four family-centred care components were addressed across interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review emphasizes the need for continuity of care intervention studies to include both PwS and their caregivers. Future research should investigate interventions that promote a family-centered care approach. The review also highlights that current interventions do not address all transitions across the stroke care continuum. Finally, future interventions should explore which aspects of continuity of care may need to be prioritized at specific transition points.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Rehabilitation

RehabilitationMedicine