PofoliaShared via Pofolia

SAGE Open· 2014Q1

Qualitative Content Analysis

Satu Elo, Maria Kääriäinen, Outi Kanste, Tarja Pölkki et al.

Short summary

A checklist for improving the trustworthiness of qualitative content analysis in nursing science studies has been developed, addressing data collection to reporting.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Trustworthiness in qualitative content analysis is often described using terms like credibility, dependability, and transferability.
  • The paper examines trustworthiness across all phases of qualitative content analysis: preparation, organization, and reporting.
  • A checklist has been compiled to help researchers improve the trustworthiness of their content analysis studies.
  • Defective descriptions of data collection and analysis methods often make evaluating trustworthiness difficult.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Qualitative content analysis is commonly used for analyzing qualitative data. However, few articles have examined the trustworthiness of its use in nursing science studies. The trustworthiness of qualitative content analysis is often presented by using terms such as credibility, dependability, conformability, transferability, and authenticity. This article focuses on trustworthiness based on a review of previous studies, our own experiences, and methodological textbooks. Trustworthiness was described for the main qualitative content analysis phases from data collection to reporting of the results. We concluded that it is important to scrutinize the trustworthiness of every phase of the analysis process, including the preparation, organization, and reporting of results. Together, these phases should give a reader a clear indication of the overall trustworthiness of the study. Based on our findings, we compiled a checklist for researchers attempting to improve the trustworthiness of a content analysis study. The discussion in this article helps to clarify how content analysis should be reported in a valid and understandable manner, which would be of particular benefit to reviewers of scientific articles. Furthermore, we discuss that it is often difficult to evaluate the trustworthiness of qualitative content analysis studies because of defective data collection method description and/or analysis description.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. SAGE Open, 2014 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Education

EducationSocial Sciences