PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Oral Health· 2026Q1

Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding dentine hypersensitivity: a cross-sectional study among dental practitioners in Sana'a, Yemen

Basem H. AL-Huthaifi, Taghreed Ahmed M Al-Kibsi, Baker M. Abdullah, Khalid Aldhorae et al.

Short summary

A survey of 402 dental practitioners in Sana'a, Yemen, found moderate knowledge (28.1% scored "good") and positive attitudes towards dentine hypersensitivity (DH), but only 36.6% felt very confident in managing it, indicating a knowledge-practice gap.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Only 28.1% of 402 dental practitioners in Sana'a achieved "good" scores on DH knowledge.
  • 57.2% knew the hydrodynamic theory, but 44.3% held misconceptions about systemic factors.
  • 61.2% acknowledged DH's impact on quality of life, yet only 36.6% felt very confident in managing it.
  • Fluoride varnish was the most common treatment (75.9%), while lasers were rarely used (13.4%).
  • Diagnostic difficulties (67.2%) and patient non-adherence (49.3%) were major perceived barriers.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background/aim Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) is a common clinical condition characterized by short, sharp pain originating from exposed dentine. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding DH among dental practitioners in Sana'a, Yemen. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 402 dentists and specialists in Sana'a from July to August 2025. A validated 29-item questionnaire assessed demographics, knowledge, attitudes, clinical practices, perceived barriers, and preventive practices. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests with Cramer's V for effect sizes, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for key proportions. Results A total of 402 of 440 submitted questionnaires (91.4%) were complete and included in the analysis. Participants demonstrated moderate DH knowledge; 28.1% (95% CI: 24.0–32.5%) scored "good." The hydrodynamic theory was known by 57.2% (95% CI: 52.3–62.0%), but misconceptions about systemic factors persisted (44.3%). Higher knowledge was associated with female sex (χ 2 = 11.13, p = 0.004, V = 0.17) and postgraduate qualifications (χ 2 = 19.24, p = 0.014, V = 0.16). Attitudes were generally positive: 61.2% (95% CI: 56.3–65.9%) acknowledged DH's impact on quality of life, but only 36.6% (95% CI: 32.0–41.5%) felt very confident in managing DH. Diagnosis relied mainly on patient history (89.3%; 95% CI: 85.8–92.1%). Management focused on identifying risk factors (73.6%; 95% CI: 69.0–77.8%). Fluoride varnish was the most commonly used treatment (75.9%; 95% CI: 71.4–80.0%), while lasers were rarely used (13.4%; 95% CI: 10.3–17.2%). Major barriers included diagnostic difficulties (67.2%) and patient non-adherence (49.3%). Most participants (83.6%) desired further DH education. Conclusion Dental professionals in Sana'a demonstrated moderate knowledge and positive attitudes but struggled to translate these into confident, evidence-based practice. The knowledge–practice gap indicates a need for structured educational interventions, including context-based guidelines and improved access to advanced therapies. Owing to convenience sampling and the focus on Sana'a, the findings may not be generalizable to rural areas or other Yemeni governorates.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Oral Health, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Orthodontics

OrthodonticsDentistry