PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Applied Sciences· 2026Q2· Review

Large Language Model-Enabled Systems for Pediatric Speech and Language Assessment: A Scoping Review

Christos Papanikolaou, Eleftheria Geronikou, Betty Kollia, Voula Chris Georgopoulos

Short summary

LLM-enabled systems for pediatric speech and language assessment demonstrate technical feasibility and agreement with human evaluations, but current evidence is limited by small datasets, synthetic data use, and insufficient real-world validation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Seven studies were included in a scoping review of LLM-enabled systems for pediatric speech and language assessment.
  • LLM systems show preliminary technical feasibility and agreement with human or reference-based assessments.
  • Evidence is limited by small/restricted datasets, use of synthetic data, and insufficient real-world validation.
  • Concerns exist regarding fairness and generalizability across languages and clinical populations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Pediatric speech and language assessment supports the early identification of communication difficulties and access to timely intervention. Large language models (LLMs) and related generative artificial intelligence technologies are increasingly being incorporated into systems that analyze children’s speech and language data. However, evidence regarding their application in pediatric assessment remains limited and fragmented. This scoping review aimed to map and critically examine research on LLM-enabled systems used to assess children’s speech, language, and communication abilities. Four databases were searched, and seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Data were charted according to study design, purpose, participant and target-population characteristics, assessment domain, type of LLM, model input, role of the LLM, additional artificial-intelligence components, evaluation methods, and reported outcomes. The findings provide preliminary evidence of technical feasibility and agreement with human or reference-based assessments. However, the evidence remains limited because of small or restricted datasets, the use of synthetic data in some cases, limited real-world validation, and concerns regarding fairness and generalizability across languages and clinical populations. Further research is necessary to establish clinical validity, reliability, and appropriate use of LLM-enabled systems before their broader implementation in pediatric speech and language assessment.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Applied Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Developmental and Educational Psychology

Developmental and Educational PsychologyPsychology