PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Animal Models and Experimental Medicine· 2026Q1

A self‐retaining mouth prop for intraoral access during periodontal surgery in rat models: A technical note

Saravanan Sampoornam Pape Reddy, Delfin Lovelina Francis, Vivek Kumar Thakur, Balaji Manohar et al.

Short summary

A novel self-retaining mouth prop significantly reduced retraction time (2.5 min vs. 6.3 min), slippage events (0.1 vs. 3.4), and operator fatigue in rat intraoral surgery compared to manual methods.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A self-retaining mouth prop was fabricated from stainless-steel wire with helices and auxiliary prongs.
  • The prop reduced retraction time from 6.3 ± 1.2 min to 2.5 ± 0.6 min (p < 0.001) in rat intraoral surgery.
  • Slippage events per procedure decreased from 3.4 ± 1.1 to 0.1 (p < 0.001) with the prop.
  • Operator fatigue scores were significantly lower with the prop (2.4 ± 0.8 vs. 7.2 ± 1.4, p < 0.001).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background Rodent models are widely used in oral health research; however, maintaining stable and effective intraoral retraction in the small oral cavity is challenging. Manual retraction methods often lead to procedural instability, operator fatigue, and increased tissue trauma during rodent oral surgery. Methods A stainless‐steel wire mouth prop incorporating helices for self‐retention and auxiliary lateral soft tissue displacement prongs was fabricated. 32 adult Wistar albino rats were randomly allocated to two groups ( n = 16 each). In the experimental group, procedures were performed using a custom mouth prop, and the control group underwent conventional manual retraction. Outcomes included time to achieve adequate retraction, slippage events per procedure, operator fatigue scores, and complication rates. Student's t ‐test was used for statistical analysis of retraction time, and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for slippage frequency, and fatigue scores. Statistical significance was determined using a Bonferroni‐adjusted threshold of p < 0.017. Results Retraction time was significantly shorter in the experimental group (2.5 ± 0.6 min) than in control group (6.3 ± 1.2 min, p < 0.001). Slippage events per procedure were markedly lower with mouth prop (0.1 vs . 3.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.001). Operator fatigue scores were also reduced (2.4 ± 0.8 vs . 7.2 ± 1.4, p < 0.001). Complication rates were significantly lower in the experimental group ( p = 0.024). Conclusion The proposed custom‐made mouth prop demonstrated favorable procedural handling characteristics during rat intraoral surgery and may serve as a practical, low‐cost refinement tool for improving intraoral access and procedural stabilization in experimental oral research settings.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Periodontics

PeriodonticsDentistry