PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Agricultural Systems· 2026Q1

Structural heterogeneity shapes economic resilience and ecosystem-service trade-offs in Mediterranean Montado agroecosystems: a farm-level bioeconomic analysis

Nour-Elhouda Fatahi, Seyed-Ali Hosseini-Yekani, Teresa Pinto‐Correia, Maria de Belém Costa Freitas et al.

Short summary

Mediterranean Montado farm archetypes exhibit distinct economic resilience profiles, with livestock-specialized farms heavily reliant on Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) support, becoming unprofitable (-€19,242 operating profit) under full CAP withdrawal.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Economic resilience varied significantly across three Montado farm archetypes, with Resilience Index scores of 0.907 (forestry-oriented), 0.839 (mixed), and 0.752 (livestock-specialized).
  • The livestock-specialized farm archetype faced a projected operating profit loss of €19,242 under full Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) withdrawal, indicating structural dependence on subsidies.
  • Diversification did not buffer climate stress in the mixed agro-silvopastoral system, which experienced correlated vulnerabilities in feed supply, water availability, and livestock energy needs.
  • Marginal results-based payments were more effective than flat supplements, increasing operating profit by 42.2% in the most policy-exposed system by driving land-use changes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

CONTEXT Mediterranean agro-silvopastoral systems provide both market outputs and ecosystem services, yet their economic capacity to remain viable under climate, market, and policy stress may depend strongly on farm structure. The Portuguese Montado exemplifies this challenge: beneath a shared landscape label lie structurally distinct farm archetypes whose economic responses to external shocks may differ markedly. OBJECTIVE This study examines whether structural heterogeneity, among three purposefully selected Montado farm archetypes, shapes their economic resilience profiles and ecosystem-service trade-offs under common external stressors. METHODS The forestry-oriented case was represented by a deterministic accounting model, whereas the mixed agro-silvopastoral and livestock-specialized cases used calibrated nonlinear optimization models. Economic resilience was evaluated using a Resilience Index, Conditional Value-at-Risk, operating-profit sensitivity, and scenario-specific viability outcomes. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Economic resilience differed systematically across archetypes (RI: 0.907, 0.839, and 0.752, respectively). Policy exposure explained most of this divergence: the livestock-specialized farm became unprofitable under full Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) withdrawal (operating-profit proxy: -€19,242), indicating that public support is structurally enabling for this archetype. Climate responses were also heterogeneous: diversification did not buffer stress in the mixed system, which faced correlated vulnerabilities across feed supply, water availability, and livestock energy requirements. Ecosystem-service provision involved non-linear, archetype-specific opportunity costs, and marginal results-based payments outperformed flat supplements by inducing land-use adjustments that more than offset compliance costs in the most policy-exposed system (+42.2% operating-profit gain). SIGNIFICANCE Economic resilience in Mediterranean agroecosystems cannot be inferred from average-farm assessments. This study provides a replicable framework for archetype-sensitive agri-environmental policy design in Montado-type and other heterogeneous silvopastoral systems.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Agricultural Systems, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

ForestryAgricultural and Biological Sciences