PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Anesthesia and Pain Medicine· 2026Q2· Review

Oliceridine for acute pain management: pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety, and future perspectives: a narrative review

Min Kyoung Kim, Hyun Kang

Short summary

Oliceridine, a novel G-protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist, shows comparable analgesia to morphine but with potentially lower rates of nausea, vomiting, and respiratory events, though a clear overall advantage or reduced abuse liability over conventional opioids is not yet established.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Oliceridine is a G-protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist with reduced β-arrestin recruitment.
  • Preclinical studies indicated lower GI dysfunction and respiratory depression compared to morphine.
  • Phase III trials showed oliceridine provided rapid analgesia comparable to morphine.
  • Oliceridine demonstrated lower incidences of nausea, vomiting, and respiratory events than morphine in trials.
  • Current evidence has not established a clinically meaningful overall advantage or reduced abuse liability over conventional opioids.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Opioids are a cornerstone in the management of moderate-to-severe acute pain; however, their clinical utility is limited by well-recognized challenges, including respiratory depression, gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction, and the potential for misuse and abuse. Oliceridine is a novel μ-opioid receptor agonist with G-protein-biased signaling and reduced β-arrestin recruitment. It exhibits potent analgesic effects while potentially reducing opioid-related adverse events. In preclinical investigations, oliceridine was associated with lower rates of GI dysfunction and respiratory depression than morphine. In the phase III clinical trials APOLLO-1 and APOLLO-2, certain oliceridine regimens produced rapid and effective analgesia comparable to that of morphine, with lower incidences of nausea, vomiting, and respiratory events. However, current evidence has not demonstrated a clinically meaningful overall advantage compared to conventional opioids. In addition, a clinically meaningful reduction in abuse liability relative to conventional opioids has not been established, underscoring the complexity of opioid reward mechanisms. This narrative review examines the pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and ongoing controversies surrounding oliceridine and evaluates its potential role in perioperative pain management.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineMedicine