PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Oxford University Press eBooks· 2015· Book chapter

Rule By Aesthetics

Asher Ghertner

Short summary

Aesthetic norms, rather than mapping or surveying, are increasingly used by states to administer space, leading to the displacement of populations deemed 'visually out of place'.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Aesthetic norms are replacing traditional methods like mapping and surveying for state administration of space.
  • In Delhi, slums were demolished because they 'looked illegal', leading to the displacement of one million residents.
  • This 'rule by aesthetics' subverts legal and democratic procedures by deeming subjects 'visually out of place'.
  • Slum dwellers' appropriation of aesthetic norms indicates a new form of political claims-making centered on urban aesthetics.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract This book offers a powerful examination of mass demolition in the world's second largest city of Delhi, India. Using Delhi's millennial effort to become a world-class city, the book shows how aesthetic norms can replace the procedures of mapping and surveying typically considered necessary to administer space. This practice of evaluating territory based on its adherence to aesthetic norms—what the text calls "rule by aesthetics"—allowed the state in Delhi to intervene in the once ungovernable space of slums, overcoming its historical reliance on inaccurate maps and statistics. Slums hence were declared illegal because they looked illegal, an arrangement that led to the displacement of a million slum residents in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Drawing on close ethnographic engagement with the slum residents targeted for removal, as well as the planners, judges, and politicians who targeted them, the book demonstrates how easily plans, laws, and democratic procedures can be subverted once the subjects of democracy are seen as visually out of place. Slum dwellers' creative appropriation of dominant aesthetic norms shows, however, that aesthetic rule does not mark the end of democratic claims-making. Rather, it signals a new relationship between the mechanism of government and the practice of politics, one in which struggles for a more inclusive city rely more than ever on urban aesthetics, in Delhi as in aspiring world-class cities the world over.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Oxford University Press eBooks, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Law

LawSocial Sciences