Harvard University Press eBooks· 2012· Book chapter
Define and Rule
- 443citations
- 2012year
Short summary
British colonial rule shifted from eradicating difference to managing it, defining natives by tribal identity and custom over law and history, a legacy still evident in contemporary Darfur.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- British colonial rule reoriented from eradicating difference to defining and managing it.
- Natives were increasingly defined by tribal identity and custom, rather than universal law or history.
- This colonial legal framework, exemplified in Sudan, linked tribal identity to access to land and political power.
- Decolonization movements, like those led by Yusuf Bala Usman and Julius Nyerere, challenged this colonial legal and administrative logic.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Define and Rule focuses on the turn in late nineteenth-century colonial statecraft when Britain abandoned the attempt to eradicate difference between conqueror and conquered and introduced a new idea of governance, as the definition and management of difference. Mahmood Mamdani explores how lines were drawn between settler and native as distinct political identities, and between natives according to tribe. Out of that colonial experience issued a modern language of pluralism and difference. A mid-nineteenth-century crisis of empire attracted the attention of British intellectuals and led to a reconception of the colonial mission, and to reforms in India, British Malaya, and the Dutch East Indies. The new politics, inspired by Sir Henry Maine, established that natives were bound by geography and custom, rather than history and law, and made this the basis of administrative practice. Maine’s theories were later translated into “native administration” in the African colonies. Mamdani takes the case of Sudan to demonstrate how colonial law established tribal identity as the basis for determining access to land and political power, and follows this law’s legacy to contemporary Darfur. He considers the intellectual and political dimensions of African movements toward decolonization by focusing on two key figures: the Nigerian historian Yusuf Bala Usman, who argued for an alternative to colonial historiography, and Tanzania’s first president, Mwalimu Julius Nyerere, who realized that colonialism’s political logic was legal and administrative, not military, and could be dismantled through nonviolent reforms.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Harvard University Press eBooks, 2012 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Law
LawSocial Sciences