PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The Library Quarterly· 2013Q2

Queering the Catalog: Queer Theory and the Politics of Correction

Emily Drabinski

Short summary

Applying queer theory to library cataloging reveals that classification systems, despite attempts at correction, can never be fully neutralized due to their inherent ideological nature.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Queer theory questions the possibility of finally correcting ideological biases in library classification.
  • Classification systems are inherently ideological, not objective or neutral.
  • Responsibility shifts from catalogers offering functional solutions to public services librarians teaching critical engagement with the catalog.
  • Patrons should be taught to dialogically engage with the catalog as a complex, biased text.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Critiques of hegemonic library classification structures and controlled vocabularies have a rich history in information studies. This project has pointed out the trouble with classification and cataloging decisions that are framed as objective and neutral but are always ideological and worked to correct bias in library structures. Viewing knowledge organization systems from a queer perspective, however, challenges the idea that classification and subject language can ever be finally corrected. Engaging queer theory and library classification and cataloging together requires new ways of thinking about how to be ethically and politically engaged on behalf of marginal knowledge formations and identities who quite reasonably expect to be able to locate themselves in the library. Queer theory invites a shift in responsibility from catalogers, positioned to offer functional solutions, to public services librarians, who can teach patrons to dialogically engage the catalog as a complex and biased text, just as critical catalogers do.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Library Quarterly, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Library and Information Sciences

Library and Information SciencesSocial Sciences