PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies· 2017

On "Diversity" as Anti-Racism in Library and Information Studies: A Critique

David J. Hudson

Short summary

This paper critiques the dominant "diversity" paradigm in Library and Information Studies (LIS), arguing it functions as a liberal anti-racism that inhibits substantive engagement with racism as a structural and historical phenomenon.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The dominant "diversity" paradigm in LIS is critiqued as a liberal anti-racism.
  • Diversity's focus on inclusion and individual cultural competence inhibits treating racism as structural.
  • The paradigm reifies race, preventing exploration of how racial formations are produced by power.
  • An alternative approach foregrounds race as a historical construct for deeper inquiry into LIS's alignment with racial subordination.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Drawing on a range of critical race and anti-colonial writing, and focusing chiefly on Anglo-Western contexts of librarianship, this paper offers a broad critique of diversity as the dominant mode of anti-racism in LIS. After outlining diversity's core tenets, I examine the ways in which the paradigm's centering of inclusion as a core anti-racist strategy has tended to inhibit meaningful treatment of racism as a structural phenomenon. Situating LIS diversity as a liberal anti-racism, I then turn to diversity's tendency to privilege individualist narratives of (anti-)racism, particularly narratives of cultural competence, and the intersection of such individualism with broader structures of political-economic domination. Diversity's preoccupation with demographic inclusion and individual behavioural competence has, I contend, left little room in the field for substantive engagement with race as a historically contingent phenomenon: race is ultimately reified through LIS diversity discourse, effectively precluding exploration of the ways in which racial formations are differentially produced in the contextually-specific exercise of power itself. I argue that an LIS foregrounding of race as a historical construct - the assumption of its contingency - would enable deeper inquiry into the complex ways in which our field - and indeed the diversity paradigm specifically - aligns with the operations of contemporary regimes of racial subordination in the first place. I conclude with a reflection on the importance of the Journal of Critical Information and Library Studies as a potential site of critical exchange from which to articulate a sustained critique of race in and through our field.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 2017 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Library and Information Sciences

Library and Information SciencesSocial Sciences