Journal of Clinical Medicine· 2026Q2· Review
Liver Function Assessment in Oncology: Current Tools for Evaluating Hepatic Reserve and Surgical Decision-Making
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A multimodal strategy combining liver volumetry with functional assessments (e.g., indocyanine green clearance, LiMAx testing, imaging) is recommended for evaluating hepatic reserve in cancer patients undergoing liver resection, as no single method is universally superior.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Conventional scores (Child-Pugh, MELD, ALBI) provide accessible global hepatic status but lack regional and dynamic functional assessment.
- Complementary methods include indocyanine green clearance, LiMAx testing, liver stiffness, scintigraphy, and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.
- Future liver remnant (FLR) volumetry is central to surgical planning.
- An individualized, multimodal strategy is supported, combining volumetry with functional/portal-hypertension assessments based on resection extent, disease, and prior treatments.
- Emerging approaches like radiomics and AI are being explored for enhanced assessment.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of hepatic functional reserve is essential in patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies undergoing liver resection, particularly in the presence of chronic liver disease, chemotherapy-associated liver injury, cholestasis, or portal hypertension. Conventional laboratory parameters and clinical scores, including Child-Pugh, MELD, ALBI, and the combined APRI/ALBI score, provide accessible measures of global hepatic status and risk stratification but do not directly quantify regional function or dynamic metabolic capacity. Complementary approaches include indocyanine green clearance, LiMAx testing, liver stiffness measurement, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, and CT/MRI-based future liver remnant volumetry. This narrative review critically examines the strengths, limitations, and clinical applicability of these modalities in the context of contemporary evidence and recommendations. Building on, but extending beyond, the 2023 E-AHPBA-ESSO-ESSR Innsbruck consensus, we incorporate subsequent comparative evidence on blood-based scores and functional imaging and discuss emerging approaches including longitudinal assessment, radiomics, and artificial intelligence. Current evidence supports an individualized, multimodal strategy in which volumetry remains central to surgical planning, while additional functional and portal-hypertension assessment is selected according to the extent of resection, underlying parenchymal disease, previous treatment, and local expertise. No single modality or fixed combination can currently be considered universally superior, highlighting the need for prospective validation of integrated and cost-effective assessment strategies.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Hepatology
HepatologyMedicine