PofoliaShared via Pofolia

NEJM Evidence· 2022Q1

Tremelimumab plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Ghassan K. Abou‐Alfa, George Lau, Masatoshi Kudo, Stephen L. Chan et al.

Short summary

The STRIDE regimen (a single priming dose of tremelimumab plus durvalumab) significantly improved overall survival by 15% compared to sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (16.43 vs. 13.77 months).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The STRIDE regimen (tremelimumab + durvalumab) significantly improved overall survival versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (16.43 vs. 13.77 months).
  • Overall survival at 36 months was higher with STRIDE (30.7%) compared to sorafenib (20.2%).
  • Durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib for overall survival.
  • Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between STRIDE (50.5%) and sorafenib (52.4%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A single, high priming dose of tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated antigen 4) plus durvalumab (anti–programmed cell death ligand-1), an infusion regimen termed STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab), showed encouraging clinical activity and safety in a phase 2 trial of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: In this global, open-label, phase 3 trial, the majority of the patients we enrolled with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and no previous systemic treatment were randomly assigned to receive one of three regimens: tremelimumab (300 mg, one dose) plus durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks; STRIDE), durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks), or sorafenib (400 mg twice daily). The primary objective was overall survival for STRIDE versus sorafenib. Noninferiority for overall survival for durvalumab versus sorafenib was a secondary objective. RESULTS: In total, 1171 patients were randomly assigned to STRIDE (n=393), durvalumab (n=389), or sorafenib (n=389). The median overall survival was 16.43 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.16 to 19.58) with STRIDE, 16.56 months (95% CI, 14.06 to 19.12) with durvalumab, and 13.77 months (95% CI, 12.25 to 16.13) with sorafenib. Overall survival at 36 months was 30.7%, 24.7%, and 20.2%, respectively. The overall survival hazard ratio for STRIDE versus sorafenib was 0.78 (96.02% CI, 0.65 to 0.93; P=0.0035). Overall survival with durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95.67% CI, 0.73 to 1.03; noninferiority margin, 1.08). Median progression-free survival was not significantly different among all three groups. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred for 50.5% of patients with STRIDE, 37.1% with durvalumab, and 52.4% with sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: STRIDE significantly improved overall survival versus sorafenib. Durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03298451.)

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. NEJM Evidence, 2022 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Hepatology

HepatologyMedicine