PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management· 2026Q1

Lean but strained: a socio-technical explanation of the safety paradox in just-in-time modular construction

John Nsikan

Short summary

Just-in-time (JIT) practices in modular construction increase operational strain, which paradoxically enhances employee safety through compensatory vigilance, according to a study of 103 firms.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • JIT practices in modular construction are positively associated with employee safety but also increase operational strain.
  • Operational strain is positively associated with safety, explained by short-term compensatory vigilance.
  • Operational strain partially mediates the relationship between JIT and employee safety.
  • High supply reliability attenuates the strain-inducing effects of JIT, acting as a stabilizing factor.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Purpose Although just-in-time (JIT) systems drive efficiency, their underlying trade-offs regarding employee safety in modular construction remain critically under-researched. Addressing this gap in socio-technical operations literature, this study investigates the impact of JIT practices on employee safety and evaluates how operational strain and supplier integration alter this relationship in low-slack production environments. Design/methodology/approach A two-wave, multi-informant survey design was employed to separate predictor and outcome variables across respondents and time, thereby reducing common-method bias. Data were collected from 346 matched responses from managerial and frontline personnel across 103 modular construction firms operating in a developing economy context characterised by high supply variability and infrastructural constraint. The hypothesised moderated mediation model was estimated using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), with robustness verified through a Gaussian Copula endogeneity correction, full collinearity assessment, and PLSpredict cross-validated predictive relevance. Findings Results show that JIT is positively associated with employee safety but simultaneously increases operational strain. Contrary to a priori expectation, operational strain is positively associated with safety, suggesting short-term compensatory vigilance, and consistent with HRO theory. Mediation analysis reveals that operational strain partially explains the JIT–safety relationship. Furthermore, high supply reliability attenuates the strain-inducing effects of JIT, serving as a stabilising boundary condition. Practical implications Managers should align JIT implementation with supply reliability and closely monitor operational strain to sustain efficiency without compromising worker safety. Originality/value The study conceptualises JIT as a variability-redistribution mechanism that reallocates operational pressures to frontline employees, offering a behavioural explanation for the lean–safety relationship in Prefabricated-JIT systems.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Radiological and Ultrasound TechnologyHealth Professions