PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics· 2026Q2

Proactively unpacking socio-technical hazards in aviation management of change: an application of the accident scenario model for systemic risk identification

Oke Hendra, Nawang Kalbuana

Short summary

The accident scenario model successfully identified 11 major socio-technical hazards, including workload saturation and competency gaps, in an aviation provider's management of change (MoC) project.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The accident scenario model was applied to identify socio-technical hazards in an aviation management of change (MoC) project.
  • The model successfully identified 11 major hazards, such as workload saturation, competency gaps, and cultural reticence.
  • Complex failure pathways stemming from latent socio-technical conditions were revealed through accident scenarios.
  • The study offers empirical validation for the proactive use of the accident scenario model in MoC.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Management of change (MoC) processes often fail to prevent incidents by overlooking emergent socio-technical hazards. Conventional assessments lack the systemic depth to proactively identify these factors. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the accident scenario model as a proactive methodology for MoC hazard identification. Employing a single-case study of an Indonesian aviation provider's MoC project, data (documents, interviews, observations) were triangulated and findings validated through focus group discussions. The methodology successfully identified 11 major socio-technical hazards including workload saturation, competency gaps and cultural reticence. Accident scenarios revealed complex failure pathways stemming from these often-latent conditions. This research offers novel empirical validation for the proactive application of the accident scenario model to MoC, providing a practical tool for systemic, human and organizational factors (HOF)-focused hazard identification that moves beyond traditional linear assessments. The findings provide actionable insights for enhancing MoC effectiveness by addressing critical socio-technical vulnerabilities in aviation and beyond.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Radiological and Ultrasound TechnologyHealth Professions