PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Applied Linguistics· 2012Q1

The Linguistic Repertoire Revisited

B. Busch

Short summary

This paper introduces language portraits as a novel method to empirically study how speakers represent their heteroglossic linguistic repertoires, incorporating poststructuralist concepts like power and desire.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Introduces language portraits as a novel, multimodal biographical method for studying linguistic repertoires.
  • Advocates for poststructuralist approaches (Derrida, Butler) to understand linguistic repertoires.
  • Highlights the importance of power and desire in speakers' representation of their linguistic resources.
  • Revisits and challenges Gumperz's notion of linguistic repertoire in the context of super-diversity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This article argues for the relevance of poststructuralist approaches to the notion of a linguistic repertoire and introduces the notion of language portraits as a basis for empirical study of the way in which speakers conceive and represent their heteroglossic repertoires. The first part of the article revisits Gumperz’s notion of a linguistic repertoire, and then considers the challenge to the concept represented by the conditions of super-diversity. It then argues that poststructuralist approaches, exemplified in the work of Jacques Derrida and Judith Butler, add an exploration of previously neglected factors such as the power of categories or the significance of desire in language. In the second part, this article considers a novel methodological approach to studying linguistic repertoires: a multimodal, biographical approach using a language portrait, which involves a close reading of the visual and verbal representation of linguistic experience and linguistic resources. The final part of the article discusses how a poststructuralist approach can contribute to expanding the notion of ‘repertoire’.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Applied Linguistics, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Linguistics and Language

Linguistics and LanguageSocial Sciences