PofoliaShared via Pofolia

· 2015

Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact

Michael Feldman, Sorelle A. Friedler, John Moeller, Carlos Scheidegger et al.

Short summary

This paper defines disparate impact in algorithms as a legal concept where a seemingly neutral selection process yields widely different outcomes for different protected groups.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Disparate impact occurs when a neutral selection process has widely different outcomes for different groups.
  • A protected class (e.g., ethnicity, gender) must be defined.
  • An explicit description of the selection process is required for legal determination.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

What does it mean for an algorithm to be biased? In U.S. law, unintentional bias is encoded via disparate impact, which occurs when a selection process has widely different outcomes for different groups, even as it appears to be neutral. This legal determination hinges on a definition of a protected class (ethnicity, gender) and an explicit description of the process.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Safety Research

Safety ResearchSocial Sciences