PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Science· 2012Q1

Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks

Sinan Aral, D. Walker

Short summary

A method using randomized experimentation on 1.3 million Facebook users identified distinct influence and susceptibility patterns: younger users are more susceptible, men are more influential, women influence men more than women, and married individuals are least susceptible to product adoption influence.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A new method using randomized experimentation on 1.3 million Facebook users accurately measures social influence and susceptibility.
  • Younger users are more susceptible to influence than older users.
  • Men are more influential than women, and women influence men more than other women.
  • Married individuals are the least susceptible to influence regarding product adoption.
  • Influential individuals are less susceptible to influence and cluster in the network, unlike susceptible individuals.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Identifying social influence in networks is critical to understanding how behaviors spread. We present a method that uses in vivo randomized experimentation to identify influence and susceptibility in networks while avoiding the biases inherent in traditional estimates of social contagion. Estimation in a representative sample of 1.3 million Facebook users showed that younger users are more susceptible to influence than older users, men are more influential than women, women influence men more than they influence other women, and married individuals are the least susceptible to influence in the decision to adopt the product offered. Analysis of influence and susceptibility together with network structure revealed that influential individuals are less susceptible to influence than noninfluential individuals and that they cluster in the network while susceptible individuals do not, which suggests that influential people with influential friends may be instrumental in the spread of this product in the network.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Science, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Communication

CommunicationSocial Sciences