PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Management· 2012Q1

At What Level (and in Whom) We Trust

C. Ashley Fulmer, Michele J. Gelfand

Short summary

A systematic review of 2000-2011 trust research reveals that most studies focus on individual-level trust, neglecting interpersonal, team, and organizational levels and referents.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Most trust research between 2000-2011 focused on individual-level trust.
  • Trust research needs to systematically address multiple levels (individual, team, organization) and referents (interpersonal, team, organization).
  • The review analyzes antecedents, consequences, and theoretical perspectives across different trust levels and referents.
  • The paper identifies strengths, weaknesses, and research gaps in the current trust literature.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Despite the importance of trust across multiple levels in organizations, extant reviews have focused predominantly on trust at the individual level. A systematic review of trust research across levels and trust referents is sorely needed to synthesize the growing number of both micro and macro studies on this topic. Moreover, as trust is a linchpin for divergent areas, such as negotiation, leadership, team processes, human resource management, organizational change, entrepreneurship, and strategic alliances, a multilevel–multireferent review of trust can facilitate integration in the field of organizational sciences. In this review, the authors adopt a levels-of-analysis approach to organize the research on trust between 2000 and 2011 in multiple referents that include interpersonal, team, and organization at the individual, team, and organizational levels and analyze the similarities and differences in antecedents, consequences, and theoretical perspectives dominant at each level. Building on this foundation, the authors identify current strengths, weaknesses, and research gaps; offer recommendations for integration across levels and referents; and discuss lingering questions that research so far has overlooked. In doing so, the review offers a systematic and comprehensive view of the current state of the trust literature in organizational sciences and provides a blueprint for future research.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Management, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Communication

CommunicationSocial Sciences