American Economic Review· 2012Q1
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply
- 6,146citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2012year
Short summary
This reply argues that criticisms of the 2001 Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson paper on colonial origins of development are not robust, as they rely on dropping significant data and inconsistent coding.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
TakeawaysIn the app
Key pointsIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways, key points and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: Demography
DemographySocial Sciences