Clinical Oral Investigations· 2026Q1
Residual monomers and volatile leachable substances of conventional and CAD/CAM-fabricated denture base materials — GC-MS analysis and surface characterization
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
3D-printed denture resins are formulated without methyl methacrylate (MMA), unlike conventional autopolymerized, thermally polymerized, and milled materials, which showed varying MMA content.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Methyl methacrylate (MMA) content was highest in thermally polymerized resins, followed by autopolymerized and milled materials; it was absent in the MMA-free 3D-printed resin.
- GC-MS screening detected 24 distinct compounds in the solid denture base materials.
- Surface roughness on the polished face was similar across materials (Ra ≈ 0.21–0.25 μm), but varied on the tissue-contacting face (Ra 0.37–1.03 μm).
- MMA levels in extracts did not exceed those of the negative control for any material group.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Methacrylic acid ester-based resins for denture fabrication release residual monomers and leachable substances that may interact with oral tissues. With increasing adoption of CAD/CAM technologies, a systematic comparison of leachable substance profiles and surface characteristics across polymerization methods is needed. Materials and methods This study compared the chemical composition and profiles of leachable substances of four denture materials – autopolymerized, thermal polymerized, milled, and 3D-printed – using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Surface roughness was evaluated by confocal microscopy. Results GC–MS screening detected 24 distinct compounds in the solid specimens. Among the MMA/PMMA-based materials, methyl methacrylate content was highest in the thermally polymerized resin, followed by the autopolymerized and milled materials, and absent from the 3D-printed resin, consistent with its MMA-free formulation. MMA levels in the extracts did not exceed those of the negative control in any group. Surface roughness was comparable on the polished face (R a ≈ 0.21–0.25 μm), consistent with SEM findings but material-dependent on the unpolished, tissue-contacting face (R a 0.37–1.03 μm). Conclusions Both fabrication method and material formulation influence the volatile and semi-volatile extractables of denture resins. As the present GC–MS screening may not reliably capture high-molecular-weight dimethacrylates such as Bis-EMA and UDMA, novel CAD/CAM materials require additional, complementary toxicological evaluation. Clinical relevance The leachable substance profiles of CAD/CAM denture resins, particularly the distinct compounds detected in the 3D-printed material, underscore the need for material-specific biocompatibility data to support informed clinical material selection and patient safety.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Orthodontics
OrthodonticsDentistry