Population and Development Review· 2015Q1
Re‐theorizing Family Demographics
- 752citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2015year
Short summary
A multiple equilibrium framework, driven by the diffusion of gender-egalitarian norms, explains recent reversals in marriage and fertility decline, challenging prior theories that predicted a continuous "less-family" scenario.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Dominant family theories predicted continuous decline in marriage and fertility, spearheaded by the highly educated.
- Recent trends show a halt or reversal of fertility decline and couple instability in several countries.
- The social gradient on fertility and couple stability has also reversed.
- A multiple equilibrium framework is proposed to explain both decline and recovery phases.
- The diffusion of gender-egalitarian norms is identified as the core driver of the observed turnaround.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Two dominant theories within family research foresee a long‐term decline in marriage, fertility, and partner stability. They also assume that this “less‐family” scenario will be spearheaded by higher‐educated strata. Trends in the latter half of the twentieth century seemed to provide ample support for both predictions. However, recent signs of change in family behavior raise doubts about their continued validity. In a number of countries we see a halt to, and even reversal of, fertility decline and of couple instability. In parallel, we observe a reversal of the social gradient on both dimensions. Applying a multiple equilibrium framework, we propose a theoretical framework that helps explain both the phase of marital and fertility decline and the subsequent recovery. We focus especially on the endogenous dynamics of the process, which, we argue, depend on the conditions that favor rapid diffusion. Our core argument is that the turnaround is driven by the diffusion of gender‐egalitarian norms.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Population and Development Review, 2015 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Demography
DemographySocial Sciences