PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Nutrients· 2026Q1

Dietary and Circulating Advanced Glycation End Products in Relation to Inflammation and Cognitive Function in Healthy Young Adults

Mevra Aydın Çil, Neva Karataş, Fatma Betül Özgeriş, Esen Taşğın et al.

Short summary

Higher levels of circulating advanced glycation end products (sAGEs) and TNF-α were associated with poorer working memory (Digit Span Backward) in healthy young adults (n=unknown).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Higher sAGEs (β = −0.36) and TNF-α (β = −0.33) were associated with poorer Digit Span Backward performance in healthy young adults.
  • Dietary AGE intake, estimated via FFQ and 3D-FR, was not significantly associated with circulating AGEs or cognitive performance.
  • sAGEs were positively associated with sRAGE (β = 0.505), which in turn was positively associated with inflammation (β = 0.601).
  • Inflammation was associated with poorer Digit Span Backward performance (β = −0.398), supporting an indirect pathway from sRAGE to cognition via inflammation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background: Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) may link diet, systemic inflammation, and cognitive function; however, evidence in healthy young adults is limited. Objective: This study aimed to examine the associations of dietary AGE (dAGE) intake, circulating AGE–RAGE biomarkers, inflammation, and oxidant–antioxidant markers with cognitive performance. Methods: This cross-sectional study included healthy young adults aged 19–26 years. dAGE intake was estimated using a food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and a three-day food record (3D-FR). Serum AGEs (sAGEs), soluble RAGE (sRAGE), interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), malondialdehyde, catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione were measured. Cognitive performance was assessed using Digit Span Forward, Backward, and Total scores and Stroop Interference. Separate multivariable linear regression models were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and Beck Depression Inventory-II scores, with Benjamini–Hochberg false-discovery-rate correction. Covariate-adjusted partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) examined the prespecified sAGE–sRAGE–inflammation pathways. Results: In the correlation analyses, dAGE intake estimated using the FFQ and 3D-FR was not significantly associated with sAGE concentrations (p > 0.05). In the separate regression models, higher sAGEs (β = −0.36, 95% CI −0.54 to −0.16) and TNF-α (β = −0.33, 95% CI −0.53 to −0.13) were associated with poorer Digit Span Backward performance after false-discovery-rate correction. No other cognitive associations remained significant. In PLS-SEM, sAGEs were positively associated with sRAGE (β = 0.505, p < 0.001), and sRAGE was positively associated with inflammation (β = 0.601, p < 0.001). Greater inflammation was associated with poorer Digit Span Backward performance (β = −0.398, 95% CI −0.697 to −0.110, p = 0.009), whereas the direct sRAGE–Digit Span Backward path was not significant. An indirect inverse association between sRAGE and Digit Span Backward through inflammation was supported (β = −0.239, 95% bootstrap CI −0.457 to −0.057). Conclusions: In conclusion, higher circulating sAGEs and TNF-α concentrations were associated with poorer working-memory performance, particularly on Digit Span Backward, in healthy young adults, whereas estimated dAGE intake showed no significant associations with cognitive performance. Longitudinal studies with larger samples are needed to establish temporality and confirm the significance of these associations.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Nutrients, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Clinical Biochemistry

Clinical BiochemistryBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology