PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences· 2012Q1

Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students

Corinne A. Moss‐Racusin, John F. Dovidio, Victoria L. Brescoll, Mark Graham et al.

Short summary

Science faculty at research-intensive universities rated identical student applications, assigning male applicants significantly higher competence, hireability, starting salary, and mentoring than female applicants.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Identical student applications received different ratings based solely on gendered names.
  • Male applicants were rated significantly more competent and hireable than female applicants.
  • Faculty offered male applicants higher starting salaries and more career mentoring.
  • Both male and female faculty members exhibited this gender bias.
  • Preexisting subtle bias against women moderated the degree of bias shown.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Despite efforts to recruit and retain more women, a stark gender disparity persists within academic science. Abundant research has demonstrated gender bias in many demographic groups, but has yet to experimentally investigate whether science faculty exhibit a bias against female students that could contribute to the gender disparity in academic science. In a randomized double-blind study (n = 127), science faculty from research-intensive universities rated the application materials of a student-who was randomly assigned either a male or female name-for a laboratory manager position. Faculty participants rated the male applicant as significantly more competent and hireable than the (identical) female applicant. These participants also selected a higher starting salary and offered more career mentoring to the male applicant. The gender of the faculty participants did not affect responses, such that female and male faculty were equally likely to exhibit bias against the female student. Mediation analyses indicated that the female student was less likely to be hired because she was viewed as less competent. We also assessed faculty participants' preexisting subtle bias against women using a standard instrument and found that preexisting subtle bias against women played a moderating role, such that subtle bias against women was associated with less support for the female student, but was unrelated to reactions to the male student. These results suggest that interventions addressing faculty gender bias might advance the goal of increasing the participation of women in science.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Gender Studies

Gender StudiesSocial Sciences