American Psychologist· 2018Q1
The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary.
- 975citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2018year
Short summary
Empirical findings from neuroscience, endocrinology, psychology, and developmental research fundamentally undermine the gender binary, revealing the malleability of gender categories and the similarities between sexes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Neuroscience findings refute sexual dimorphism of the human brain.
- Behavioral neuroendocrinology challenges the notion of genetically fixed, sexually dimorphic hormonal systems.
- Psychological research demonstrates significant similarities between men and women.
- Research on transgender and nonbinary individuals highlights diverse identities and experiences.
- Developmental research indicates that viewing gender as a binary category is culturally determined and malleable.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The view that humans comprise only two types of beings, women and men, a framework that is sometimes referred to as the "gender binary," played a profound role in shaping the history of psychological science. In recent years, serious challenges to the gender binary have arisen from both academic research and social activism. This review describes 5 sets of empirical findings, spanning multiple disciplines, that fundamentally undermine the gender binary. These sources of evidence include neuroscience findings that refute sexual dimorphism of the human brain; behavioral neuroendocrinology findings that challenge the notion of genetically fixed, nonoverlapping, sexually dimorphic hormonal systems; psychological findings that highlight the similarities between men and women; psychological research on transgender and nonbinary individuals' identities and experiences; and developmental research suggesting that the tendency to view gender/sex as a meaningful, binary category is culturally determined and malleable. Costs associated with reliance on the gender binary and recommendations for future research, as well as clinical practice, are outlined. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. American Psychologist, 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Gender Studies
Gender StudiesSocial Sciences