Orthopedic Reviews· 2026Q2· Review
Tranexamic Acid in Femoral and Tibial Fracture Surgery A Narrative Review of Administration Routes and Effects on Blood Loss Safety and Fracture Healing
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces calculated blood loss in femoral and tibial fracture surgery, with intravenous administration generally supported by randomized trials and topical TXA showing benefits in specific blood-conservation outcomes, though transfusion benefits are inconsistent and route comparisons are procedure-dependent.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Intravenous TXA is generally supported by randomized trials for reducing calculated blood loss in fracture surgery, though transfusion benefits are inconsistent.
- Topical TXA improves selected blood-conservation outcomes, with direct comparisons to intravenous TXA showing procedure-dependent results.
- Evidence for TXA's effect on fracture healing is sparse, with no established acceleration or route preference for this outcome.
- Studies generally did not detect increased thromboembolic events, but limited sample sizes preclude firm conclusions on safety.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is used to reduce perioperative bleeding in fracture surgery, but the preferred administration route and its effects on fracture healing remain uncertain. This narrative review examines intravenous, topical, and combined TXA in adult femoral and tibial fracture surgery, emphasizing direct route comparisons and the distinction between blood conservation and patient-centered outcomes. Publications identified in an initial Elicit-assisted evidence report were selectively checked against primary sources, supplemented by targeted source searches. No meta-analysis or formal risk-of-bias assessment was performed. Randomized trials generally support reductions in calculated blood loss with intravenous TXA, although transfusion benefits are not uniform. Topical TXA improves selected blood-conservation outcomes, while direct comparisons with intravenous administration yield procedure-dependent results. Adding local TXA to intravenous treatment reduced calculated blood loss in a tibial nailing trial, but observational hip-fracture studies do not establish a consistent advantage for combined administration. Studies generally did not detect increased thromboembolic events; limited sample sizes and selected populations preclude firm conclusions about uncommon harms or comparative safety. Fracture-union evidence is sparse and does not establish that TXA accelerates healing or that one route is preferable for this purpose. TXA is a useful blood-conservation adjunct in selected femoral and tibial fracture procedures, but current evidence does not support a universal ranking of administration routes. Procedure-specific randomized comparisons with standardized transfusion criteria and longer-term union and functional outcomes are needed.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Orthopedic Reviews, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Biochemistry (Medicine)
BiochemistryMedicine