Restoration Ecology· 2017Q1
A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?
- 711citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2017year
Short summary
A new theory identifies four key factors—context, process design, power dynamics/values/epistemologies, and scale—that explain variations in outcomes for stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Developed a new typology of engagement based on who initiates/leads and the mode (communication to coproduction).
- Proposed a theory explaining engagement outcomes based on four factors: context, process design, participant dynamics, and scale.
- Identified that power dynamics, participant values, and epistemologies (knowledge construction) significantly influence engagement effectiveness.
- Engagement processes operate differently and yield varied outcomes across different spatial and temporal scales.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract This article differentiates between descriptive and explanatory factors to develop a typology and a theory of stakeholder and public engagement. The typology describes different types of public and stakeholder engagement, and the theory comprises four factors that explain much of the variation in outcomes (for the natural environment and/or for participants) between different types of engagement. First, we use a narrative literature search to develop a new typology of stakeholder and public engagement based on agency (who initiates and leads engagement) and mode of engagement (from communication to coproduction). We then propose a theory to explain the variation in outcomes from different types of engagement: (1) a number of socioeconomic, cultural, and institutional contextual factors influence the outcomes of engagement; (2) there are a number of process design factors that can increase the likelihood that engagement leads to desired outcomes, across a wide range of sociocultural, political, economic, and biophysical contexts; (3) the effectiveness of engagement is significantly influenced by power dynamics, the values of participants, and their epistemologies, that is, the way they construct knowledge and which types of knowledge they consider valid; and (4) engagement processes work differently and can lead to different outcomes when they operate over different spatial and temporal scales. We use the theoretical framework to provide practical guidance for those designing engagement processes, arguing that a theoretically informed approach to stakeholder and public engagement has the potential to markedly improve the outcomes of environmental decision‐making processes.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Restoration Ecology, 2017 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Public Administration
Public AdministrationSocial Sciences