Medicine· 2026Q2
Cardiovascular adverse events of tocilizumab and baricitinib in COVID-19 and rheumatoid arthritis
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Baricitinib for COVID-19 showed significantly higher cardiovascular adverse event (CVAE) disproportionality (IC, 2.90; ROR, 11.95) compared to other indications and tocilizumab, suggesting indication-dependent risks when immunomodulators are repurposed.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Baricitinib use for COVID-19 showed the highest disproportionality for cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) with an IC of 2.90 and ROR of 11.95.
- Both baricitinib and tocilizumab showed increased CVAE disproportionality in the post-COVID-19 Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) period compared to the pre-EUA period.
- Machine learning models identified COVID-19 as a key risk factor for baricitinib's CVAEs and RA for tocilizumab's CVAEs.
- A total of 5994 CVAEs were identified from 17,750,053 adverse event reports.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Tocilizumab and baricitinib are used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and COVID-19, where acute hyperinflammation and systemic stress may amplify cardiovascular risk. Comparative evidence on indication-specific cardiovascular signals remains scarce; we therefore assessed these signals by indication. We analyzed the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data from January 2010 to June 2025 to compare cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) associated with baricitinib and tocilizumab. Primary outcomes included 6 CVAE categories: cardiac arrhythmias, central nervous system vascular disorders, embolic and thrombotic events, ischemic heart disease, noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis, and other cardiac disorders. Disproportionality was assessed using the information component (IC) and reporting odds ratio (ROR), stratified by pre- and post-COVID-19 Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) periods and indications (COVID-19 vs RA). Machine learning models were additionally trained to characterize risk patterns for each drug, with feature contributions interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations. Among 17,750,053 reports, 5994 CVAEs were identified (baricitinib, n = 965; tocilizumab, n = 5029). Disproportionality was higher in the post-EUA than the pre-EUA period for both baricitinib (IC, 0.84 [IC 025 , 0.59] to 1.51 [1.39]; ROR, 1.89 [95% confidence interval, 1.62–2.21] to 3.22 [2.98–3.48]) and tocilizumab (0.22 [0.16] to 0.54 [0.47]; 1.18 [1.14–1.23] to 1.50 [1.43–1.57]). Baricitinib for COVID-19 showed the highest disproportionality (IC, 2.90 [IC 025 , 2.70]; ROR, 11.95 [95% confidence interval, 10.33–13.83]). Gradient boosting machine achieved the highest AUROC (baricitinib, 0.728; tocilizumab, 0.702), and SHapley Additive exPlanations highlighted COVID-19 indication for baricitinib and RA for tocilizumab. Our findings suggest indication-dependent cardiovascular signals when immunomodulators are repurposed for acute viral infections, underscoring the need for context-aware evaluation in drug repurposing.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
ToxicologyPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics