PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Gastroenterology· 2026Q1

Claims-based frailty and short-term adverse events after esophageal or gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in older adults

Hiroyuki Hisada, Yosuke Tsuji, Naomi Kakushima, Dai Kubota et al.

Short summary

In older adults (≥75 years) undergoing esophageal or gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a claims-based frailty score (HFRS) identified patients at higher risk for short-term adverse events, particularly perforation/peritonitis and delayed bleeding.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Frailty, defined by the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) from claims data, was associated with a 1.35 adjusted odds ratio for composite short-term adverse events after esophageal or gastric ESD in patients aged ≥75 years.
  • The increased risk of adverse events in frail patients was mainly driven by perforation/peritonitis and delayed bleeding.
  • No significant differences were found in 30-day all-cause mortality, thromboembolic events, or aspiration pneumonia between frail and non-frail groups.
  • Frail patients showed lower overall survival during follow-up, although median length of stay was similar.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background Risk stratification before esophageal and gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in older adults often relies on age and comorbidity; however, these measures may not capture vulnerability reflected in routinely collected claims data. We aimed to evaluate the claims-based frailty and short-term adverse events association after esophageal and gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Methods We used a nationwide Japanese administrative database to identify patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent first esophageal or gastric ESD. Frailty was defined using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), calculated from diagnoses during a 2 year lookback period. After 1:1 propensity score matching, frail and non-frail patients were compared. The primary outcome was binary composite of short-term adverse events, including in-hospital perforation/peritonitis, delayed bleeding, thromboembolism, aspiration pneumonia, and 30 day all-cause mortality. Component outcomes, survival, length of stay, costs, and readmission were also evaluated. Results Among 15,184 eligible patients, 4,970 matched pairs were included. Frailty was associated with the composite adverse outcome (adjusted odds ratio 1.35; 95% confidence interval 1.19–1.53), driven mainly by perforation/peritonitis and delayed bleeding. No significant differences were observed for 30 day mortality, thromboembolic events, or aspiration pneumonia. Frailty was also associated with lower overall survival during follow-up, whereas median length of stay was identical between groups. Conclusion Among older adults undergoing esophageal or gastric ESD, HFRS-defined claims-based frailty was associated with higher rates of short-term adverse events, particularly perforation/peritonitis and delayed bleeding. These findings suggest that routinely collected claims data may help identify vulnerable patients who warrant closer peri-procedural assessment and monitoring.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Gastroenterology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Geriatrics and Gerontology

Geriatrics and GerontologyMedicine